Geopolitics
Resolves: Jan 2027 2 months left Volume: $2.3M

Iran agrees to surrender enriched uranium stockpile by December 31, 2026?

NO
92c
YES
8c

As of September 3, 2026, Polymarket prices “Iran agrees to surrender enriched uranium stockpile by December 31, 2026?” at 8% YES with $2.3M traded. 3 tracked wallets hold a position here; the dominant side is NO.

Iran has given no public sign it will surrender its enriched uranium stockpile, despite Trump's claim of a deal by year-end.

Down from 14% to 8% since 2026-07-10 (-6pp)

What’s Happening

The question of whether Iran agrees to surrender enriched uranium stockpile gained fresh urgency on July 11, 2026, when U.S. officials confirmed that surrendering the country's stock of highly enriched uranium — described internally as "nuclear dust" — remains a non-negotiable condition for any nuclear deal. The demand was formalized under a June 2026 memorandum of understanding that opened a 60-day negotiation window. This hardline stance built on earlier momentum: on May 23, 2026, two U.S. officials said Iran had agreed "in principle" to give up its stockpile of highly enriched uranium, though Tehran never publicly confirmed the concession. [Kyiv Post, Jul 11]

Hawks in Washington have paired diplomacy with explicit threats. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth warned on April 16, 2026 that "if Iran chooses poorly, then they will have a blockade and bombs dropping on infrastructure, power, and energy," while President Donald Trump claimed Iran had already agreed to hand over the material. Analysts urge caution: as regional expert Ali Vaez noted, prior frameworks — like the 2015 accord under which Iran shipped roughly 97% of its stockpile to Russia — succeeded only because both sides avoided "yes-or-no ultimatums." A reported package would also tie any deal to Iran reopening the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for lifting the U.S. blockade and staged sanctions relief. [CBS News, May 25]

The structural obstacle to whether Iran agrees to surrender enriched uranium stockpile before December 31, 2026 is verification: negotiators have settled "broad principles," but Tehran has offered no public confirmation and much "hinges on the details of how that would be accomplished." Absent a signed, verified transfer of the physical material within the calendar year, the demand remains an aspiration rather than a completed act. [NYT, May 23]

Traded on Polymarket — $2.3M Volume

Trade this market on Polymarket →
On this market: 6/7 models independently agree NO — rare convergence. Full verdict track record on the accuracy page.
PRO Analysis

See which tracked wallets hold this market (entries, size, P&L), the models’ fair value and entry targets — and get an alert within a minute when they trade.

MODERATE AI VERDICT
BUY NO 93c

6/7 models agree on NO, fair value 10c vs market 8c. Weak edge — consider waiting for stronger signal.

+3% TARGET YIELD
56c
95c
100c
93c
90c
Stop Loss Current Target Fair Value

6 of 7 Models Agree: NO

ModelSaysFair Value estimated fair priceConfidence
MATH PIN ModelNO98c—
MATH Compound SignalNO74c—
AI Claude AnalysisNO94c
85%
AI DeepSeek QuantNO91c
82%
AI Grok Contrarian???22c
41%
AI Gemini FlashNO88c
80%
AI Kimi MacroNO95c
78%

6 of 7 models estimate NO fair value below market (74–98c vs 92c). Claude Analysis leads with 85% confidence.

Models estimate fair value of NO at 90c — market prices it at 92c. 2-point gap supports YES.

Why One Model Is Uncertain: Grok Contrarian at 22c — Market's 8% YES underprices tail risks of sudden Iranian capitulation under intensified sanctions, regime fracture, or post-strike coerci...

3 Market Makers Providing Liquidity

Tracked wallets show unanimous NO positioning, with entries between 69c and 92c, signaling strong conviction that Iran will not surrender its enriched uranium stockpile by the deadline. The absence of any profitable YES entries suggests smart money sees the 8c YES price as overvalued and expects further decay toward zero. This one-sided positioning implies the market is pricing near-certainty of a NO outcome.

WalletCategorySideAmountP&L
0x0c0e..4eMMNO$22.1K+0%
0xbacd..35MMNO$3.6K+19%
0x24c8..e1MMYES$1.8K-100%
See all 89 tracked wallets →  ·  Learn about copy trading →

All NO Positions Are in Profit

All YES positions are underwater with entries at 45c against a current 8c price, while every NO position is profitable with entries spanning 69c-92c. The extreme NO profitability and total YES losses create strong downward pressure, as profitable NO holders have little incentive to exit and YES holders face steep drawdowns. This dynamic reinforces the 8c floor as a likely ceiling for any near-term bounce.

YES positions
0% in profit
NO positions
100% in profit

Polymarket: 8c YES — $2.3M Volume

Polymarket prices YES at 8c with $2.3M in total volume. Our model estimates fair value at 10c. 2-point gap is within normal range — no significant mispricing.

PlatformYES PriceVolume
Polymarket8c$2.3M
Our Model10c—

Related Markets

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the current odds for Iran agrees to surrender enriched uranium stockpile by December 31, 2026?

As of October 2026, Polymarket prices this at 8% YES with $2.3M in total volume.

Where can I bet on Iran agrees to surrender enriched uranium stockpile by December 31, 2026?

This market is available on Polymarket (crypto-native, global access via USDC). OddsShift tracks prices and smart money positioning in real time.

What does smart money say about Iran agrees to surrender enriched uranium stockpile by December 31, 2026?

OddsShift tracks 3 smart money wallets on this market. Dominant position: NO. Smart money wallets are selected based on historical profitability across Polymarket.

What do AI models predict for Iran agrees to surrender enriched uranium stockpile by December 31, 2026?

OddsShift runs mathematical + AI models on every alpha market. Current fair value estimate: 10c YES. 6 models agree on direction.