As of September 1, 2026, Polymarket prices “Will Mary Peltola win the Alaska Senate race in 2026?” at 74% YES with $699K traded. 1 tracked wallet holds a position here; the dominant side is NO.
Prediction markets put the probability at 64%: Will Mary Peltola win the Alaska Senate race in 2026. Currently, markets are divided (64% YES, 36% NO).
The Mary Peltola Alaska Senate race in 2026 took a decisive shape on August 18, 2026, when Alaska’s nonpartisan top-four primary concluded with former Democratic Rep. Mary Peltola and Republican incumbent Sen. Dan Sullivan advancing to the November general election. The primary also produced a quirk: a second candidate named Dan Sullivan, a Republican, secured the third slot, while the fourth spot remained contested as of August 19. Peltola, an Alaska Native and self-described moderate running on “fish, family and freedom,” finished as the leading Democrat in a field where the top four vote-getters advance regardless of party affiliation. The outcome sets up a direct head-to-head between Peltola and the Trump-endorsed incumbent, with the race widely viewed as pivotal to Senate control, where Republicans currently hold a slim majority [ABC News, Aug 19].
The procedural mechanics of Alaska’s ranked-choice general election now take center stage, with the ballot set for November 3, 2026. A Data for Progress survey conducted from July 28 to August 4, 2026 of 605 likely voters showed Peltola leading Sullivan, driven largely by Alaska’s deepening affordability crisis—a theme Peltola has hammered on the campaign trail. At an August 27, 2026 candidate forum hosted by the Alaska Oil and Gas Association in Anchorage, Peltola largely avoided direct attacks on Sullivan, instead describing herself as “pro-development” and a champion for the oil industry, a strategic pivot to appeal to cross-party voters in a state heavily reliant on energy revenue. Sullivan, for his part, went on the offensive in the first post-primary faceoff, signaling a contentious general election campaign [Alaska Beacon, Aug 28].
Looking ahead, the Mary Peltola Alaska Senate race in 2026 hinges on ranked-choice vote transfers, a system that could benefit Peltola if the second Sullivan candidate and a fourth-place finisher—likely a Republican—split the conservative vote. The New York Times reported on August 18 that Democrats almost certainly need Peltola to defeat Sullivan to have any shot at reclaiming the Senate majority, underscoring the national stakes. The general election ballot will be finalized after state certification in early September, with absentee voting beginning in October. Peltola’s campaign has signaled a focus on subsistence rights, energy independence, and cost-of-living relief, while Sullivan is expected to lean on his incumbency and Trump endorsement. The race remains fluid, with the 64% YES probability on this market reflecting Peltola’s polling lead but also the uncertainty of Alaska’s unique electoral mechanics [NYT, Aug 18].
See which tracked wallets hold this market (entries, size, P&L), the models’ fair value and entry targets — and get an alert within a minute when they trade.
Unlock PRO — $29/mo5/6 models agree on NO, fair value 16c vs market 74c. BUY NO at 74c — models see 58c of upside.
| Model | Says | Fair Value estimated fair price | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| MATH PIN Model | NO | 98c | — |
| AI Claude Analysis | YES | 70c | 55% |
| AI DeepSeek Quant | NO | 78c | 68% |
| AI Grok Contrarian | NO | 82c | 72% |
| AI Gemini Flash | NO | 75c | 75% |
| AI Kimi Macro | NO | 85c | 72% |
5 of 6 models estimate NO fair value above market (75–98c vs 26c). Gemini Flash leads with 75% confidence.
Models estimate fair value of NO at 84c — market prices it at 26c. 58-point gap supports NO.
The single tracked wallet has built a one-sided NO position with entries clustered at 22c, indicating concentrated smart-money conviction that Peltola will not win the Alaska Senate race. No YES entries from this wallet reinforce a directional bet against the 74c market price, implying the trader sees the true probability well below current odds. This positioning suggests informed money views the YES side as overpriced.
| Wallet | Category | Side | Amount | P&L | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0xde7b..4b | MM | NO | $11.5K | +22% |
With YES at 74c, all YES holders are underwater while every NO position is in profit, creating asymmetric pressure on the YES side. The absence of profitable YES entries suggests the current price lacks support from winning longs, making a pullback more likely than a breakout. NO traders at 22c hold substantial unrealized gains, which could tempt profit-taking but also signals strong conviction against a Peltola Senate win.
Polymarket prices YES at 74c with $699K in total volume. Our model estimates fair value at 16c. Significant 58-point gap — model sees NO as substantially mispriced.
| Platform | YES Price | Volume |
|---|---|---|
| Polymarket | 74c | $699K |
| Our Model | 16c | — |