As of September 3, 2026, Polymarket prices “Israel x Iran ceasefire continues through December 31?” at 62% YES with $340K traded. 2 tracked wallets hold a position here; the dominant side is YES.
Prediction markets put the probability at 62%: Israel x Iran ceasefire continues through December 31. Currently, markets are divided (62% YES, 38% NO).
The trajectory of the israel x iran ceasefire continues through december 31 question hinges on the fragile, multi-front truce architecture established in late 2025. As of June 2, 2026, Iran’s semi-official Tasnim news agency reported that Tehran’s negotiating team would suspend peace talks with the U.S. over Israel’s ongoing war with Hezbollah in Lebanon, citing “continuation of the Zionist regime’s crimes in Lebanon.” This suspension directly threatens the broader U.S.-Iran ceasefire framework, which Tehran has linked to a halt in Israeli operations against Hezbollah. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in a June 1 statement, said Israel would not cease attacks on Beirut if Hezbollah does not halt attacks on Israeli civilians, adding that operations in southern Lebanon will continue as planned, complicating any path toward a durable regional pause [CBS News, Jun 02].
The mechanism overseeing the November 2024 Israel-Hezbollah ceasefire has effectively stalled, with no meetings held since January 7, 2026, and sessions scheduled for January 10 and 17 postponed. While Lebanese and Israeli officials held frequent direct meetings through the mechanism between December 2025 and early January 2026 to resolve outstanding issues, those meetings produced limited results. Israeli officials reportedly requested that Lebanon “raise the level of its negotiations,” signaling that the current framework is insufficient to address core disputes. Meanwhile, Iran has reportedly told mediators that any ceasefire agreement with the United States and Israel must also end Israeli operations in Lebanon, with six regional sources telling Reuters on March 25 that Iran gave Hezbollah “guarantees” it would include the group in any broader deal [ISW, Mar 27].
The structural factor determining whether the israel x iran ceasefire continues through december 31 is the degree to which Washington can enforce a unified framework linking the U.S.-Iran track to the Lebanon theater. President Trump stated on June 2 that Iran talks are continuing at a “rapid pace,” but Iran’s threat to open “other fronts” in the war underscores the volatility. Iran views Hezbollah as a central component of its deterrence strategy, meaning an extension of the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire is likely a precondition for any sustained U.S.-Iran understanding. Conversely, Israeli hawks, including Netanyahu, have publicly rejected any linkage that would constrain operations against Iranian proxies. The next 30 days will test whether the mediation channel—reportedly still active despite Tasnim’s announcement—can bridge these positions before the December 31 deadline becomes moot [Critical Threats, Jun 01].
See which tracked wallets hold this market (entries, size, P&L), the models’ fair value and entry targets — and get an alert within a minute when they trade.
Unlock PRO — $29/moTracked wallets are positioned YES, but 3/6 models estimate NO. Wallets and models disagree — no entry.
| Model | Says | Fair Value estimated fair price | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| MATH PIN Model | YES | 98c | — |
| AI Claude Analysis | ??? | 60c | 42% |
| AI DeepSeek Quant | ??? | 55c | 40% |
| AI Grok Contrarian | NO | 62c | 71% |
| AI Gemini Flash | NO | 65c | 65% |
| AI Kimi Macro | NO | 65c | 72% |
3 of 6 models estimate NO fair value above market (62–65c vs 38c). Kimi Macro leads with 72% confidence.
Models estimate fair value of NO at 64c — market prices it at 38c. 26-point gap supports NO.
Smart money wallets show concentrated YES accumulation between 62c-68c, signaling conviction in the ceasefire continuing through year-end. The absence of NO entries implies these traders see limited downside risk, but the lack of fresh YES buying above 68c suggests they are waiting for a pullback or catalyst to add. This positioning leans bullish but not aggressively so, leaving room for a retest of lower support.
| Wallet | Category | Side | Amount | P&L | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0x162f..8d | MM | YES | $5.5K | +6% | |
| 0x7c3d..6b | MM | YES | $3.7K | -9% |
YES holders are largely in profit, with entries as low as 62c against the current 62c price, indicating strong support at this level. NO side has no tracked entries, so no immediate profit-taking pressure from that side. The dominant YES positioning suggests resilience, but the flat price vs. entry range hints at potential consolidation before a decisive move.
Polymarket prices YES at 62c with $340K in total volume. Our model estimates fair value at 36c. Significant 26-point gap — model sees NO as substantially mispriced.
| Platform | YES Price | Volume |
|---|---|---|
| Polymarket | 62c | $340K |
| Our Model | 36c | — |