As of September 1, 2026, Polymarket prices “Strait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by November 30?” at 10% YES with $638K traded. 1 tracked wallet holds a position here; the dominant side is NO.
Prediction markets put the probability at 18%: Strait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by November 30. Currently, markets see this as unlikely (18% YES). Odds of when traffic will return to normal have tumbled sharply over the last few days.
Traders on the Kalshi exchange currently price an **18%** probability that Strait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by November 30, a sharp decline from earlier optimism. As recently as **July 4**, the market assigned more than **50%** odds that flows would normalize by **October 1**, but that figure collapsed amid renewed geopolitical friction. The contract defines normal traffic as a **7-day moving average of at least 60 transits** per day, based on data from IMF PortWatch; current transits remain in single digits, according to the exchange’s resolution criteria. [CNBC, Jul 08]
The disruption traces back to **February 28**, when the strait’s closure began following U.S. and Israeli military action, and the timeline for recovery has repeatedly slipped. A **Dallas Fed Energy Survey** published in **April** found that only **20%** of oil and gas executives expected Strait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by **May 2026**, with **39%** targeting **August** and **26%** expecting **November** — a distribution that now looks optimistic against current market pricing. Historical precedent from the Red Sea crisis reinforces the slow-recovery pattern: after the last Houthi attack in **September 2025** and a ceasefire on **November 11**, Suez Canal traffic remained **60% below pre-crisis levels** even **100 days** later. [Dallas Fed, Apr 23] [The Conversation, Jun 18]
Looking ahead, the market’s implied probability for normalization by **December 1** stands near **24%**, while the **November 1** deadline carries just **16%** odds, per recent trades. A key inflection point came after **Iran-Oman talks** in late **August**, which briefly lifted sentiment but failed to produce a sustained recovery in transit counts. Polymarket traders are comparatively more optimistic, pricing a **59%** chance of normalization by **December 31**, though both platforms rely on the same IMF PortWatch data for resolution. The practical stakes are high: the strait handles roughly **20%** of global oil consumption, and shipping firms have already rerouted vessels around the Cape of Good Hope, a detour that adds weeks to transit times and keeps freight rates elevated. [Oddsshopper, Aug 27] [CNBC, Jul 08]
See which tracked wallets hold this market (entries, size, P&L), the models’ fair value and entry targets — and get an alert within a minute when they trade.
Unlock PRO — $29/mo6/7 models agree on NO, fair value 13c vs market 10c. Weak edge — consider waiting for stronger signal.
| Model | Says | Fair Value estimated fair price | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| MATH PIN Model | NO | 98c | — |
| MATH Compound Signal | NO | 72c | — |
| AI Claude Analysis | NO | 88c | 73% |
| AI DeepSeek Quant | NO | 88c | 78% |
| AI Grok Contrarian | YES | 28c | 42% |
| AI Gemini Flash | NO | 86c | 75% |
| AI Kimi Macro | NO | 88c | 78% |
6 of 7 models estimate NO fair value below market (72–98c vs 90c). DeepSeek Quant leads with 78% confidence.
Models estimate fair value of NO at 87c — market prices it at 90c. 3-point gap supports YES.
The single tracked wallet entered NO at 89c, positioning with the dominant and profitable side of the market. This smart-money NO entry signals conviction that Strait of Hormuz traffic will not return to normal by November 30, aligning with the 10c YES pricing and suggesting continued bearish pressure on YES.
| Wallet | Category | Side | Amount | P&L | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0x0c0e..4e | MM | NO | $10.4K | +2% |
With YES at 10c, every YES holder is underwater while all NO positions are profitable, creating strong one-sided P&L pressure. The absence of profitable YES wallets removes any natural bid support, making further YES downside likely as holders capitulate. NO traders have little incentive to sell at 89c, reinforcing the low YES price.
Significant 44-cent gap: Polymarket at 10c vs Kalshi at 54c. Kalshi traders see a substantially different probability. Our model estimates fair value at 13c.
| Platform | YES Price | Volume |
|---|---|---|
| Polymarket | 10c | $638K |
| Kalshi | 54c | — |
| Our Model | 13c | — |